Women`s Soccer Collective Bargaining Agreement
The U.S. women`s soccer world champion vowed to continue fighting after a judge dismissed a significant portion of her complaint seeking compensation equivalent to that of her male colleagues. In 2016, the union had argued with the Federal Football League over the end of the collective bargaining agreement. On March 31, 2016, five members of the U.S. National Women`s Football Team filed an indictment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accusing football players of making less money than men`s players.  The complaint was filed by Hope Solo, Carli Lloyd, Megan Rapinoe, Becky Sauerbrunn and Alex Morgan, who argued that, for no other reason, men earned more money than men. The submission cited figures from the USSF`s 2015 financial report, which showed that, despite a turnover of nearly $20 million this year, women generated nearly $20 million in revenue more than the men`s team, which received women about a quarter of what men earn.  After the organization of USMNT and DEXNT In the late 1990s, a model developed and continued for more than twenty years. As the popularity of football in the United States continues to grow, the only way for USMNT players to convince the Federation to improve their wages and working conditions was to move closer to a work stoppage. In 1996, this meant that the Federation sent substitutes to play a friendly against Peru, and in 2005, it meant that the American football player from the lower league called to prepare for a World Cup qualifier against Mexico. Each time, the players refused to be harassed and eventually ensured better pay and working conditions.
The USSF and the Players Association concluded their first collective agreement in March 2001, which was in effect from February 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004.  A second collective agreement, the “2005 CBA,” was concluded on January 12, 2006.  This agreement covered the period from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2012. Each of these agreements specifically included the terms of a uniform player agreement and a pricing plan. However, the 2005 CBA also contained a “no strike, no lockout” clause preventing the Players` Association from authorizing, encouraging or involving strikes, work stoppages, slowdowns or other concerted interventions in the Federation`s activities during the duration of the agreement, and prevented the USSF from proceeding with a lockout during the duration of the agreement.  It is difficult to easily compare the merits of the players, because the two teams have different collective agreements that have a different salary structure. In February 2016, the association took THE COMPANY to court and asked for a decision on whether the existing agreement constituted a CBA.